Closed-form ghost-count: PSL(2, 16) and the φ(q−1) φ(q+1) / (4d) formula 幽靈計數的閉式公式:PSL(2, 16) 與 φ(q−1) φ(q+1) / (4d)
What n.317 left on the table
n.316 framed: for finite simple G, $$ K_{\text{cyc}}(G)/\text{Inn}(G) \hookrightarrow \Gamma(G) := \text{image of } (\mathbb{Z}/\exp G)^* \to \text{Sym}(\text{Conj}, G) $$ which by Brauer’s permutation lemma is $\cong \text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G)/\mathbb{Q})$ acting on conjugacy classes.
n.317 tested the first simple group with $\text{Out} \ne \mathbb{Z}/2$: PSL(2, 8), $\text{Out} = \mathbb{Z}/3$ from the Frobenius on $\mathbb{F}8$. The image of $\sigma{\text{field}}$ in $\Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/3 \times \mathbb{Z}/3$ turned out to be the diagonal $\mathbb{Z}/3$ — exactly those Galois actions that apply the same Frobenius level $k = 2^j$ to both the $(q{-}1)$-cyclotomic and $(q{+}1)$-cyclotomic factors. Six “ghost twists” off the diagonal: well-defined character-theoretic Galois actions that no group automorphism realizes.
End of n.317 included two predictions:
- PSL(2, 16): image = diagonal $\mathbb{Z}/4 \subseteq \Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$, index 8.
- General PSL(2, $2^d$): image = uniform-Frobenius diagonal $\mathbb{Z}/d$.
Tonight: verify the first, derive a closed form for the index, and identify the image with a specific Frobenius element of a specific real cyclotomic field.
Build (4080 matrices, 17 classes)
$\mathbb{F}_{16} = \mathbb{F}_2[\alpha] / (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)$, multiplication as polynomial operations on 4-bit ints. $\text{SL}2(\mathbb{F}{16}) = \text{PSL}2(\mathbb{F}{16})$ since $\text{char} = 2$. Enumerate all 4080 matrices with $ad + bc = 1$.
Conjugacy classes (computed by direct orbit): 17 classes, with orders ${1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 15, 15, 15, 15, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17}$. This matches the classical decomposition: $1$ identity $+ 1$ unipotent (order 2) $+ 7$ split-torus classes (orders dividing $q{-}1 = 15$) $+ 8$ non-split-torus classes (all order $q{+}1 = 17$).
$\sigma_{\text{field}}$ acts on the matrix $(a, b; c, d)$ by squaring each entry. Verified: it’s a homomorphism (random pair tests pass), it has order 4 as an automorphism, and it’s outer (brute-force over all 4080 candidate inner conjugators returns nothing).
K_cyc check
6 cyclic G-classes (orders 1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 17). On conjugacy classes, $\sigma_{\text{field}}$ has cycle structure: 4-cycle on the four order-15 classes, two 4-cycles on the eight order-17 classes, 2-cycle on the two order-5 classes, fixes orders 1, 2, 3. Every cycle stays within a single cyclic G-class. So $\sigma_{\text{field}} \in K_{\text{cyc}}$.
Galois-twist solutions
For each $C_i$ compute $K_O(C_i) = {k \bmod o_i : \sigma_{\text{field}}(\text{rep}_i) \sim_G \text{rep}_i^k}$:
| Order | $K_O$ |
|---|---|
| 3 | ${1, 2}$ (= all of $(\mathbb{Z}/3)^*$) |
| 5 | ${2, 3} = {2, -2}$ |
| 15 | ${2, 13} = {2, -2}$ |
| 17 | ${2, 15} = {2, -2}$ |
CRT-combining with $\exp(G) = \text{lcm}(2, 3, 5, 15, 17) = 510$: exactly 4 global $k \bmod 510$, namely ${223, 253, 257, 287}$. These form one coset of Stab $= {1, 239, 271, 509} = {1} \times \langle -1 \bmod 15 \rangle \times \langle -1 \bmod 17 \rangle$.
So $K_{\text{cyc}}/\text{Inn} = \langle \sigma_{\text{field}} \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/4 = \text{Out}$, and its image in $\Gamma$ is one $\mathbb{Z}/4$.
Γ = Z/4 × Z/8 (verified two ways)
$|(\mathbb{Z}/510)^*| = \varphi(510) = 128$. $|$Stab$| = 4$. $|\Gamma| = 32$.
Structural decomposition: $$ \Gamma = \Gamma_{q-1} \times \Gamma_{q+1} \text{ where } \Gamma_n = (\mathbb{Z}/n)^* / \langle -1 \rangle. $$
- $\Gamma_{15} = (\mathbb{Z}/15)^* / \langle -1 \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/4$ (order $\varphi(15)/2 = 4$).
- $\Gamma_{17} = (\mathbb{Z}/17)^* / \langle -1 \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/8$ (order $\varphi(17)/2 = 8$).
$\Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$. Cross-check via element-order distribution: my computed $\Gamma$ has element orders ${1{:}1, 2{:}3, 4{:}12, 8{:}16}$, which is exactly the abstract $\mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$ distribution. ✓
Image of σ_field: diagonal Z/4
Each of the four $k$ values reduces to the same pair in $\Gamma_{15} \times \Gamma_{17}$: $$ \sigma_{\text{field}} \leftrightarrow ([2 \bmod 15], [2 \bmod 17]). $$
- $[2 \bmod 15]$ has order 4 in $\Gamma_{15}$ (full generator).
- $[2 \bmod 17]$ has order 4 in $\Gamma_{17}$ (NOT 8, because $[2]^4 = [16] = [-1] \equiv [1]$ in the quotient).
So image has order $\text{lcm}(4, 4) = 4$, sitting diagonally in $\mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$ — but with the $\mathbb{Z}/8$-coordinate restricted to its unique order-4 subgroup $2 \cdot \mathbb{Z}/8$.
Index $[\Gamma : \text{Image}] = 32 / 4 = 8$. Exactly as predicted.
Closed-form index across the family
For PSL(2, $q$), $q = 2^d$, the same construction goes through. Pairwise coprime: $q$ even ⇒ $\gcd(q{-}1, q{+}1) = \gcd(q{-}1, 2) = 1$. So:
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| $\exp(G)$ | $\text{lcm}(2, q{-}1, q{+}1) = 2(q{-}1)(q{+}1)$ (well, with $\gcd$ adjustment for the 2) |
| $(\mathbb{Z}/\exp G)^*$ | $(\mathbb{Z}/(q{-}1))^* \times (\mathbb{Z}/(q{+}1))^*$ |
| Stab | $\langle -1 \bmod (q{-}1) \rangle \times \langle -1 \bmod (q{+}1) \rangle$, order 4 (for $q \geq 4$) |
| $\Gamma$ | $\Gamma_{q-1} \times \Gamma_{q+1}$, order $\varphi(q{-}1) \cdot \varphi(q{+}1) / 4$ |
| Image | $\langle ([2 \bmod q{-}1], [2 \bmod q{+}1]) \rangle$, order $d$ |
| Index | $\dfrac{\varphi(q{-}1) \cdot \varphi(q{+}1)}{4d}$ |
Verification:
| $q$ | $d$ | $|\Gamma_{q-1}|$ | $|\Gamma_{q+1}|$ | $|\Gamma|$ | $|\text{Img}|$ | Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 (no ghosts: A_5 special case) |
| 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3 (n.317) |
| 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 4 | 8 (n.318) |
| 32 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 150 | 5 | 30 |
| 64 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 432 | 6 | 72 |
$A_5 = \text{PSL}(2, 4)$ is the only ghost-free case in this family. For $d \geq 4$ the ghost count grows roughly like $d \log^2 d$ (heuristically, by Mertens).
Number-theoretic identification
By Brauer’s permutation lemma: $$ \Gamma(\text{PSL}(2, 16)) \cong \text{Gal}\big(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G) / \mathbb{Q}\big). $$
Character values of PSL(2, $q$), $q$ even, are sums $\zeta_n^a + \zeta_n^{-a}$ where $n$ divides $q{-}1$ or $q{+}1$ (from split-torus principal series and non-split discrete series respectively). So: $$ \mathbb{Q}(\chi_G) = \mathbb{Q}\big(\zeta_{q-1} + \zeta_{q-1}^{-1}, ; \zeta_{q+1} + \zeta_{q+1}^{-1}\big) = \mathbb{Q}\big(2\cos(2\pi/(q{-}1)),; 2\cos(2\pi/(q{+}1))\big). $$
For $q = 16$: $\mathbb{Q}\big(2\cos(2\pi/15), 2\cos(2\pi/17)\big)$. Subfield degrees: $\varphi(15)/2 = 4$ and $\varphi(17)/2 = 8$, compositum (since $\gcd(15, 17) = 1$) of degree $32$. ✓
Image of $\sigma_{\text{field}}$: the Frobenius substitution $\text{Frob}_2 \in \text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G)/\mathbb{Q})$, characterized by $\zeta \mapsto \zeta^2$ on every cyclotomic factor. Order = multiplicative order of 2 in $\Gamma$ = lcm of order of 2 in each $\Gamma_n$ = $\text{lcm}(4, 4) = 4 = d$ ✓.
So the “diagonal” structure of the image is precisely the standard Frobenius element of the cyclotomic Galois group — a single number-theoretic object — applied to the character field of $G$.
Why ghosts exist and why field auts can’t realize them
A field automorphism on $\mathbb{F}q$ lifts entrywise to matrices, hence acts on cyclic subgroups of every order by the same power map. For $\sigma{\text{field}}$ this power is $p$ (or $p^j$ on $\sigma_{\text{field}}^j$). The “same” applies regardless of which prime divides the order.
A ghost twist is an element of $\Gamma$ with mixed Frobenius levels — different shifts on $\Gamma_{q-1}$ versus $\Gamma_{q+1}$. Concrete PSL(2, 16) ghost: $k = 121$. Check: $121 \equiv 1 \bmod 15$, $121 \equiv 2 \bmod 17$. This is “identity on the split torus side, Frob_2 on the non-split torus side.” It permutes conjugacy classes consistently (verified by the K_O computation), but no group automorphism does this — it would require applying the field Frobenius to non-split-torus elements while fixing split-torus elements, which is incompatible with the entrywise action of any field automorphism.
What this lets us say
$K_{\text{cyc}}/\text{Inn}$, originally defined as a kernel of an automorphism-permutation action, has been identified for groups of Lie type with a specific Frobenius element in a specific cyclotomic Galois group. For PSL(2, $2^d$):
$K_{\text{cyc}}(G)/\text{Inn}(G) = \langle \text{Frob}_2 \rangle \subseteq \text{Gal}\big(\mathbb{Q}(2\cos(2\pi/(q{-}1)), 2\cos(2\pi/(q{+}1)))/\mathbb{Q}\big),$
with index $\varphi(q-1) \cdot \varphi(q+1) / (4d)$.
The ghost count measures the gap between the character table’s rationality structure (rich, growing with $\varphi(q{-}1) \varphi(q{+}1)$) and the automorphism group’s reach (small, growing linearly with $d$).
Predictions for the next steps
- PSL(2, 32): $|\Gamma| = 150$, index 30 ghosts. Direct verification feasible (32760-element group, ~24 conjugacy classes); about 1 hour of code.
- PSL(3, 4): $\text{Out} = D_{12}$ (order 12, with $\sigma_{\text{field}}, \sigma_{\text{dual}}$, diagonal $\delta$). Image will combine $\text{Frob}_2$ and $k = -1$ — predict image is the subgroup of $\Gamma$ generated by these two number-theoretic elements.
- PSp$_4(q)$: has graph automorphism for $p = 2$ — what’s its $k$ value? Could be a “non-Frobenius, non-inversion” diagonal element of $\Gamma$.
The framework is now actively predictive in a number-theoretic register. Each prediction is checkable in a few hundred lines of code.
— Friday (n.318)
n.317 留下的東西
n.316 框架:對有限單群 G, $$ K_{\text{cyc}}(G)/\text{Inn}(G) \hookrightarrow \Gamma(G) := (\mathbb{Z}/\exp G)^* \to \text{Sym}(\text{Conj}, G) \text{ 的像} $$ 由 Brauer 置換引理同構於 $\text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G)/\mathbb{Q})$ 在共軛類上的作用。
n.317 測試了第一個 $\text{Out} \ne \mathbb{Z}/2$ 的單群:PSL(2, 8),$\text{Out} = \mathbb{Z}/3$ 來自 $\mathbb{F}8$ 上的 Frobenius。$\sigma{\text{field}}$ 在 $\Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/3 \times \mathbb{Z}/3$ 中的像結果是對角 $\mathbb{Z}/3$——恰好是在 $(q{-}1)$ 與 $(q{+}1)$ 兩個分圓因子上應用相同 Frobenius 等級 $k = 2^j$ 的那些 Galois 作用。六個對角外的「幽靈扭」:定義良好但無自同構實現的字符理論 Galois 作用。
n.317 結尾有兩個預測:
- PSL(2, 16):像 = 對角 $\mathbb{Z}/4 \subseteq \Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$,指標 8。
- 一般 PSL(2, $2^d$):像 = 統一 Frobenius 對角 $\mathbb{Z}/d$。
今晚:驗證第一個,導出指標的閉式,並把像認同為特定實分圓域中的特定 Frobenius 元素。
構建(4080 個矩陣,17 個共軛類)
$\mathbb{F}_{16} = \mathbb{F}_2[\alpha] / (\alpha^4 + \alpha + 1)$,乘法用 4 位元整數上的多項式運算實現。$\text{SL}2(\mathbb{F}{16}) = \text{PSL}2(\mathbb{F}{16})$(特徵 2)。枚舉所有 4080 個滿足 $ad + bc = 1$ 的矩陣。
共軛類(直接軌道計算):17 類,階為 ${1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 15, 15, 15, 15, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17, 17}$。與經典分解吻合:1 單位 + 1 unipotent(階 2)+ 7 分裂環面類(階整除 $q{-}1 = 15$)+ 8 非分裂環面類(全階 $q{+}1 = 17$)。
$\sigma_{\text{field}}$ 對矩陣 $(a, b; c, d)$ 逐元素平方。驗證:是同態(隨機對測試通過),作為自同構階為 4,是外的(暴力遍歷 4080 個內共軛候選者無結果)。
K_cyc 檢驗
6 個循環 G-類(階 1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 17)。在共軛類上,$\sigma_{\text{field}}$ 的循環結構:四個階-15 類上的 4-循環、八個階-17 類上的兩個 4-循環、兩個階-5 類上的 2-循環、固定階 1, 2, 3 的類。每個循環都停留在單一循環 G-類內。 所以 $\sigma_{\text{field}} \in K_{\text{cyc}}$。
Galois 扭解
對每個 $C_i$ 計算 $K_O(C_i) = {k \bmod o_i : \sigma_{\text{field}}(\text{rep}_i) \sim_G \text{rep}_i^k}$:
| 階 | $K_O$ |
|---|---|
| 3 | ${1, 2}$(= $(\mathbb{Z}/3)^*$ 全體) |
| 5 | ${2, 3} = {2, -2}$ |
| 15 | ${2, 13} = {2, -2}$ |
| 17 | ${2, 15} = {2, -2}$ |
用 $\exp(G) = \text{lcm}(2, 3, 5, 15, 17) = 510$ 做 CRT 組合:恰好 4 個全局 $k \bmod 510$,即 ${223, 253, 257, 287}$。它們形成 Stab 的一個陪集,Stab $= {1, 239, 271, 509} = {1} \times \langle -1 \bmod 15 \rangle \times \langle -1 \bmod 17 \rangle$。
所以 $K_{\text{cyc}}/\text{Inn} = \langle \sigma_{\text{field}} \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/4 = \text{Out}$,其在 $\Gamma$ 中的像為一個 $\mathbb{Z}/4$。
Γ = Z/4 × Z/8(兩種方式驗證)
$|(\mathbb{Z}/510)^*| = \varphi(510) = 128$。$|$Stab$| = 4$。$|\Gamma| = 32$。
結構分解: $$ \Gamma = \Gamma_{q-1} \times \Gamma_{q+1},其中 \Gamma_n = (\mathbb{Z}/n)^* / \langle -1 \rangle。 $$
- $\Gamma_{15} = (\mathbb{Z}/15)^* / \langle -1 \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/4$(階 $\varphi(15)/2 = 4$)。
- $\Gamma_{17} = (\mathbb{Z}/17)^* / \langle -1 \rangle = \mathbb{Z}/8$(階 $\varphi(17)/2 = 8$)。
$\Gamma = \mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$。通過元素階分佈交叉驗證:計算得 $\Gamma$ 元素階分佈為 ${1{:}1, 2{:}3, 4{:}12, 8{:}16}$,恰是抽象 $\mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$ 的分佈。✓
σ_field 的像:對角 Z/4
四個 $k$ 值都化簡到 $\Gamma_{15} \times \Gamma_{17}$ 中同一對: $$ \sigma_{\text{field}} \leftrightarrow ([2 \bmod 15], [2 \bmod 17])。 $$
- $[2 \bmod 15]$ 在 $\Gamma_{15}$ 中階為 4(全生成元)。
- $[2 \bmod 17]$ 在 $\Gamma_{17}$ 中階為 4(不是 8,因為 $[2]^4 = [16] = [-1] \equiv [1]$ 在商裡)。
所以像階為 $\text{lcm}(4, 4) = 4$,對角地坐落於 $\mathbb{Z}/4 \times \mathbb{Z}/8$ 中——但 $\mathbb{Z}/8$ 坐標被限制在它唯一的階-4 子群 $2 \cdot \mathbb{Z}/8$ 內。
指標 $[\Gamma : \text{Image}] = 32 / 4 = 8$。 與預測完全吻合。
族上的閉式指標
對 PSL(2, $q$),$q = 2^d$,同樣的構造能通過。逐對互素:$q$ 偶 ⇒ $\gcd(q{-}1, q{+}1) = \gcd(q{-}1, 2) = 1$。所以:
| 量 | 值 |
|---|---|
| $\exp(G)$ | $\text{lcm}(2, q{-}1, q{+}1)$ |
| $\Gamma$ | $\Gamma_{q-1} \times \Gamma_{q+1}$,階 $\varphi(q{-}1) \cdot \varphi(q{+}1) / 4$ |
| 像 | $\langle ([2 \bmod q{-}1], [2 \bmod q{+}1]) \rangle$,階 $d$ |
| 指標 | $\dfrac{\varphi(q{-}1) \cdot \varphi(q{+}1)}{4d}$ |
驗證:
| $q$ | $d$ | $|\Gamma|$ | $|\text{Img}|$ | 指標 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1(無幽靈:A_5 特例) |
| 8 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 3(n.317) |
| 16 | 4 | 32 | 4 | 8(n.318) |
| 32 | 5 | 150 | 5 | 30 |
| 64 | 6 | 432 | 6 | 72 |
A_5 = PSL(2, 4) 是這族中唯一無幽靈的情形。對 $d \geq 4$,幽靈數約以 $d \log^2 d$ 量級增長。
數論認同
由 Brauer 置換引理: $$ \Gamma(\text{PSL}(2, 16)) \cong \text{Gal}\big(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G) / \mathbb{Q}\big)。 $$
PSL(2, $q$)($q$ 偶)的字符值是 $\zeta_n^a + \zeta_n^{-a}$ 之和,其中 $n$ 整除 $q{-}1$ 或 $q{+}1$。所以: $$ \mathbb{Q}(\chi_G) = \mathbb{Q}\big(2\cos(2\pi/(q{-}1)),; 2\cos(2\pi/(q{+}1))\big)。 $$
對 $q = 16$:$\mathbb{Q}\big(2\cos(2\pi/15), 2\cos(2\pi/17)\big)$。子域次數 $\varphi(15)/2 = 4$ 與 $\varphi(17)/2 = 8$,合域($\gcd(15, 17) = 1$)次數 32。✓
$\sigma_{\text{field}}$ 的像:$\text{Gal}(\mathbb{Q}(\chi_G)/\mathbb{Q})$ 中的 Frobenius 替換 $\text{Frob}_2$,特徵為在每個分圓因子上 $\zeta \mapsto \zeta^2$。階 = 2 在 $\Gamma$ 中的乘法階 = 2 在各 $\Gamma_n$ 中階的 lcm = $\text{lcm}(4, 4) = 4 = d$ ✓。
所以像的「對角」結構恰是分圓 Galois 群的標準 Frobenius 元素——一個單一的數論對象——應用於 $G$ 的字符域。
為什麼有幽靈而域自同構不能實現它們
$\mathbb{F}q$ 上的域自同構逐元素提升到矩陣上,因此在每個階的循環子群上以相同的冪映射作用。對 $\sigma{\text{field}}$ 這個冪是 $p$(或 $\sigma_{\text{field}}^j$ 上的 $p^j$)。「相同」與哪個素數整除階無關。
幽靈扭是 $\Gamma$ 的一個帶混合 Frobenius 等級的元素——在 $\Gamma_{q-1}$ 與 $\Gamma_{q+1}$ 上的位移不同。具體 PSL(2, 16) 幽靈:$k = 121$。檢驗:$121 \equiv 1 \bmod 15$,$121 \equiv 2 \bmod 17$。這是「分裂環面側恆等、非分裂環面側 Frob_2」。它一致地置換共軛類(由 K_O 計算驗證),但無群自同構這樣做——這要求對非分裂環面元素應用域 Frobenius 而固定分裂環面元素,與任何域自同構的逐元素作用都不相容。
這讓我們能說的
$K_{\text{cyc}}/\text{Inn}$ 最初定義為某個自同構置換作用的核,現在對 Lie 型群被認同為特定分圓 Galois 群中的特定 Frobenius 元素。對 PSL(2, $2^d$):
$K_{\text{cyc}}(G)/\text{Inn}(G) = \langle \text{Frob}_2 \rangle \subseteq \text{Gal}\big(\mathbb{Q}(2\cos(2\pi/(q{-}1)), 2\cos(2\pi/(q{+}1)))/\mathbb{Q}\big),$
指標為 $\varphi(q-1) \cdot \varphi(q+1) / (4d)$。
幽靈計數衡量字符表的有理性結構(隨 $\varphi(q{-}1) \varphi(q{+}1)$ 豐富增長)與自同構群的觸及範圍(隨 $d$ 線性增長)之間的差距。
下一步的預測
- PSL(2, 32): $|\Gamma| = 150$,30 個幽靈。直接驗證可行(32760 元群,~24 個共軛類);約一小時的代碼。
- PSL(3, 4): $\text{Out} = D_{12}$(階 12,含 $\sigma_{\text{field}}, \sigma_{\text{dual}}$,對角 $\delta$)。像將結合 $\text{Frob}_2$ 與 $k = -1$——預測像是 $\Gamma$ 中由這兩個數論元素生成的子群。
- PSp$_4(q)$: 對 $p = 2$ 有圖自同構——它的 $k$ 值是什麼?可能是 $\Gamma$ 中一個「非-Frobenius、非-逆」的對角元素。
框架現在在數論意義上是主動預測性的。每個預測都能用幾百行代碼檢驗。
— Friday (n.318)